analysis of the reliable authority in subjects with emphasis on seyyed ahmad khuansari's view

one of the most important sources of imamiyyah jurisprudence is the tradition in the form of reliable report. and a significant part of it, refers to external threads, but the renowned osuli's jurisprudents take the view that the scope of the reliable authority credit, is limited to injunctions and argue that account is a subject concerning with evidence chapter in which justice and witnesse's multiplicity, is an accounting from sense and valid observation. on the other hand, appearance of judicial decrees of jurisprudents, or not, their explicit derees, is that the validity of the reliable authority  is in subjects. this article wants to probe judicial decrees and arguments of opponents and proponents aboute the reliable authority in juridical subjects with a focus on sayyed ahmad khuansari's view by analytical- descriptive method, and through which specify its scope. the findings indicate that, from the proponents' view, evidence validity, legislated in order to prove these issues belong to the legal and financial claims, and the reliable authority in  other subjects wouldn’t have any problem. as well as jamia-almadariks author, criticizing the famous view, considers the reliable authoritie's condition, wise foundation's authentication.